A second essay I wrote (@jeff here) on bottlenecks in innovation argues that many promising technologies never make it to market—not just because of bad luck or weak execution, but because of something I am calling “The Parochial Problem.”
The idea is simple: an organization’s innovation output is limited by the number of open, parallel pathways it creates for ideas to reach the market. When those pathways are narrow—as they often are inside universities and their Tech Transfer Offices—ideas get trapped.
A few key takeaways:
-
Universities are central to early-stage research, but their tech-transfer systems act like local monopolies, focusing on what’s in their own backyard rather than what’s best for society.
-
This “parochial” structure reduces diversification, limits networks, and misses valuable cross-institutional connections—leading to fewer ideas escaping the lab.
-
We can draw parallels to venture finance: diversification, large sample sizes, and bridging silos all increase the odds of success—yet our innovation system violates all of these principles.
-
Just as venture capital once liberated innovation from big corporations, we now need new institutional pathways to liberate “proto-technologies” from universities.
The core argument: if America’s innovation system feels slower than it should, this may be a hidden structural reason.
Curious to hear from this group—what new models could help overcome “The Parochial Problem”? How might we create more open, parallel pathways for ideas to find their way into the world?